Cover Letter

To The Members of the Portfolio Committee,

As a recent high school graduate I spent the weeks prior to the first semester worrying about my first semester of courses, primarily my English literature course. Having excelled in virtually every literature course thrown at me within the last few years I can honestly say that I expected something very different from what I found when I stepped over the threshold on that first day of class. I do not know if it was my high school teachers trying to terrify my class into submission or the various instances in pop culture where the students gather in a dim lecture hall and merely stare at a board all day but I was most definitely not expecting to walk into a quaint little class where students were in neat rows and the professor stood at a white board outlining the semester and openly asking our opinion. And when the announcement was made that the assignments were to be done online,  with a  rough draft posted to a blog and the final draft emailed directly to the professor I was floored. I had never blogged before and I was not prepared to have to come up with a witty web handle and then give it to complete strangers so they could view it for assignments. To me my writing has always been a way to remain anonymous and to say things that scare me and now people knew my name and could see what I had to say. For the first week the course honestly scared me and yet as each meeting passed it was easier for me to come out of my shell and allow myself to share just what I had to say. I was talking to people, helping them while they helped me and it was a new experience

The first assignment that I present to you was just that-our first assignment. It was a memoir that we were to write from the perspective of five to eight inanimate and relatively similar tools that help you perform some sort of task. While initially excited about the assignment I became distinctly uncomfortable as I sat before a screen and typed out the story behind the camera, the pen, the animals, the books and the music that help me in day to day life. The entire time I wrote it was saved under As much as this project was a means of exploring the use of these materials it was also a means of exploring my. Doing what I do best, I filled the paragraphs with detail and first person perspectives, trying to paint as vivid a picture as possible with my words. Using my attention to detail I displayed focus in each paragraph by staying on the particular tool. I believe that this essay was an introduction to my writing style and displays the focus I have once I get going.

The second assignment I chose to upload is the photo essay that was assigned at the end of the semester. Having mentioned my photography in my first essay as a means of expression I had an ulterior motive for this project. Because the courses subject matter was robots I called my alma mater Mt. Hope High School in Bristol, Rhode Island, and asked if it were possible for me to go in and basically interview the current members of the robotics team. This assignment not only shows my photography but it shows that, despite my shyness, I personally went out and interviewed these people because I refused to stand in my own way. This essay was by far my most organized because when I originally made it I had set it up as a slideshow. Mapping out the interview to correspond with predetermined slides, I asked questions and took pictures for each of the points I wanted to touch down upon. Having the freedom to this assignment on any subject I wanted allowed for greater organization because it was not pre outlined in a course listing- it was my choice and I was allowed to work on it with OCD accuracy.

My third and final assignment was a proposal of whether or not robots should be used in a field of my choosing. Having written few research papers in high school it was eye opening and frightening, the worst part being that I had to slog through the thousands of search engine hits to find credible sources and then distinguishing the seemingly credible from the legitimate sites. As the daughter of two former police officers who aspires to go into law I took an interest in the idea of robots in police work and how some departments are beginning to look at putting them in positions other than on the bomb squad or in search and rescue. Taking advantage that the assignment was almost like a structured free write that required sources, I scoured the internet for facts and figures to support my argument that robots are not appropriate for police work. It took editing the proposal numerous times and rewriting my outlines about a half dozen times before I was satisfied.

This course allowed me to expand on my writing and expand on myself in a way, bringing forth a slightly less shy version of myself to the forefront and I am hoping that the English 102 Honors program will do the same next semester. It was certainly an experience and I look forward to using the skills that I learned in my English 101 class in the future. Since starting in this class I have fortified my strengths and built on my weaknesses, rounding out my writing personality and finding myself along the way.

 

Thank you for your time,

Courtney Garrity

Tools Memoir

Have you ever been so cripplingly shy that you stutter and swoon, becoming physically ill at the thought of speaking in front of a class? To feel so nauseous at the thought of just going to class that you cried and begged to stay home? For years I have been channeling my thoughts through my photography, my writing, my interaction with animals, the books I have chosen and my music. They have become my means of communicating, my means of connecting to the world. To me they are more than just tools and artifacts, they are a life line. And during my sophomore year of high school when my shyness and social anxiety forced me to miss ninety three days of school, they became my means of feeling a semblance of normalcy. When I was behind my camera or holding my pen I wasn’t constantly being asked by replacement teachers if I was a mid semester transfer student or whether my little ‘vacations’ were any fun. The days where I am editing photos or just laying with my kitten with the radio on I am not receiving taunting and pitying gazes where ever I turned. To have my photography, my music, my books, my writing and my animals is akin to having my own private world, where the pressures of society and the misconception of me being an introvert because of the fact that I’m too shy to express myself don’t exist.

*****

The Camera

The heavy feel of the camera in calloused palms was a comfort, the weight of its body and hard casing solidifying the fact that it was real as thin fingers readjusted the lenses and settings to bring it into focus and match the surroundings. With the flash off and the camera set to manual mode the image through the view finder was sharp and clear as I positioned myself carefully. The headstones in front of me were grouped like a macabre smile-crooked, broken, worn and missing in spaces with just the base visible. My finger dispensed the shutter’s release once, twice, three times as I subtly adjusted my angle by propping myself on my elbows. The near silent hiss of the shutter was comforting and with every time it sounded I felt a bit of the days stress slip away. I reviewed the images on the camera’s screen, noticing how much clearer things are when you capture them for life.  Shifting once more I found my next subject-a concrete angel set away from the main plots, standing guard over the section known as the “Little Angels,” reminding me that life can often be too short. That is what I love about photography- it serves as a form of expression, as a reminder about the life that sometimes manages to slip through our fingers. And later as I sit behind the screen of my laptop, fingers flying over the keys as the narrow blue bar gets progressively longer I feel as if I can breathe. The cursor blinks as I hesitate, staring at the blue and white ‘f’ in the corner of the page as I tap out titles and hit “Complete upload.” Now my pictures are out there, brief little descriptions beneath them on my Facebook page explaining either where they are or what I was thinking when I took it. As I minimize the page to finish this essay I listen to the little electronic ‘pings’ with pride, each one representing someone who is acknowledging my work and in a sense, acknowledging me.

*****

 

The Written Word

Vibrant, brightly inked words flowed across lined paper the letters small and neat, elegantly connected like long lost lovers upon a reunion. With every new line a piece of a story fell into place, the names of people and places changed for privacy reasons as I recounted a moment of time. Images flashed before my eyes as my hand moved as if at its own volition to scratch out the memories that had haunted me. I wrote without stopping, inserting the witty one liner I wish I had responded with and the moment where I should have been honest rather than simply smiling and saying ‘It’s okay,’ as I listened to their excuses once more because honestly, it wasn’t okay. As I wrote I adjusted what I wish he had said to me, the moment where it was possible that I was more than just the girl who helped him understand the concept of existentialism and who reminded him more often than not of upcoming due dates and mandatory events. In my writing I am someone else- outgoing, happy and most of all visible.

*****

Four Pawed family

I can honestly say that I’ve had animals my entire life- multiple dogs and cats, a duck, a bearded dragon, rabbits, and even two calves at one point-but there has always been something special about the downy soft, pastel calico kitten who was only supposed to be a temporary resident. I had expected that the night after rescuing her from behind a dumpster I would wake up the next morning and find nothing but a cold, still ball of fur and yet she surprised me then and continues to do so now. Her name is Parker, her coat a blend of stormy grey, a sweet golden maple and the purest of whites. As I type she scampers through my room, knocking knick knacks from their shelves, burrowing through the hamper and then appearing the next moment asleep in my camera bag. It is as if she’s a part of me, an extension of a limb that every time I move so does she. She’s an essential part of me, like the blood she sheds as I attempt to dislodge her from where she has tangled herself in the curtains. She is an anchor, a connection to a world outside the very one I created to keep myself from others.

*********

Those Who Read Live But a Thousand Lives

Stacks and stacks of books line every available surface- hardcover and paperback, old and new alike. The scent of ink on paper is musty but like one of the finest perfumes it is worth its weight in jewels. Visible spines, some creased with age, display their titles in small prints and some of them are even stamped leather, cracking with repetitive use. Each genre was seemingly represented, covering all subject matter from Civil War romance to the Religious theory of how witch craft was tied to the Apocalypse.  Each novel was an adventure I could only wish to have. Tales of heroine’s who had superseded all obstacles were decorated with tiny Post-It flags, creating a rainbow of colors that presented themselves like sassy little kids sticking their tongues out. As I sit before the book case, searching for my next selection my eyes sweep left and right, highlighting the well loved novels that have made the last few years bearable. Witch Child by Celia Rees, Meghan Meade’s Guide to the McGowan Boys by Katie Brian, Lone Wolf  by Jodi Picoult, and Last Man Down by FDNY Battalion Commander Richard Picciotto. I have trouble choosing and mull over a trip to the hallowed halls of the library, where more often than not these books have been on sale for mere pennies compared to their store price. And then I see it, a brand new copy of Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief. I devour the pages and get lost, so much so that I sit down at noon and blink, forcing my eyes from the pages to the clock as I hear my name being called. Four hours flew by and the novel is complete, my mind awhirl with unanswered questions and useless hopes for the characters.  There is a quote I practically live by, something that George R.R. Martin once said in A Dance With Dragons and it is that ‘A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies. The man who never reads lives only one.’ The saying is like an anthem, taken to heart if the hundreds of books lining my room have anything to say about it. They are my adventures, my escapes and you could even say they are my many chances at different lives.

*******

Music: The Universal Language

The soft plucking of guitar strings echoed first, followed closely there after by a steady drum beat and the artist’s voice which was nothing more than a croon. The lyrics were a soulful blend of happy memories and mourning, mostly country with a little bit of rock in the beat. As it played memories shot through me- an old Lazy-Boy that smelled of tobacco, fresh cut pine and old spice, a beat up truck hauling wood through town, calloused hands gently sanding down the rocking chair that sits in my room, even a set of turn out gear resting at the back door in case of emergencies.  Listening to the song is like connecting to my long gone great-grandfather, so much so that within a few months I will have inked its lyrics in my flesh. The song is Justin Moore’s “If Heaven Wasn’t So Far Away,” a song I heard on accident and cried to that very first time. It makes me wish that all those I have lost are still with me- my great grandfather, my father’s parents who I met only as an infant, all the pets I had that never lived a full life. It gives me hope that I will see them again, even if they aren’t a five minute car ride away and I know others may feel the same way when they listen to it or any other song. Music is a universal language, something everyone can listen to and relate to, something that draws people together from all walks of life. All it takes is one song to break the silence and draw the most unlikely of people into a conversation, something that I’ve used many times. Music is like the subtitles to life’s little moments, clearing up the fuzziness.

 

Why Robots Do Not Belong on the Beat

Since the industrial revolution it seems as if technology has infiltrated most fields including law enforcement nationally and internationally. Having started out as hand held radios and dispatch centers that send information across a line to squad cars, technology is now laptops and tablets in the cruisers, machines that measure a person’s blood alcohol level and even infrared scanners that are used to fingerprint person and perp alike rather than an ink pad and piece of cardstock. I believe that while there is a minuet use for robots in police work doing things such as bomb diffusion and radar, the position should be held in majority by the flesh and blood police officer. Robots would not be a good replacement for beat cops because empathy and split second decision making, two things they lack, are very important to the job and the cost effectiveness is debatable.

Established in April of 1635, one of the first police forces in the United States stemmed from a night watch group in the thirteen colonies that patrolled Boston, Massachusetts, without pay (Important Dates in Law Enforcement History). Since then the modern version of police offices have expanded throughout the United States and across the remaining continents, progressing slowly with technology and bypassing any previous militias and small patrols. As of the late twentieth and early twenty first centuries spun about there were suddenly more options as technical science and the more hands on industrial technology fields boomed. It was an evolution, spreading bits of knowledge and gear to the ends of the earth. The use of robots in law enforcement started with the World War II era military, evolving over the years to aid soldiers before hitting the home front, like most of the current police technology.

When you join the police force there are two expectations about emotional conduct. You are expected to be able to deal with the criminals without allowing your anger to control you and you are expected to interact with the victim without making them feel anymore violated no matter the crime. The majority of officers can easily empathize with the victims of crimes and the people that they interact with on calls. While some departments mandate sensitivity training, others do not. But the problem with using robots in police work is that they lack the ability to empathize with victims in their cases, they cannot make split second decisions and the robots could easily be hacked- something that could be a huge risk if the hacker is also interested in detonating the bomb that the robot is trying to defuse.  If the officers are dispatched to a rape or a case of child abuse it is all about being able to communicate a sense of understanding, to convincingly open your soul up so that the victim feels comfortable enough to relate to you their stories. As a piece of non-feeling metal, alloys, and electronics, not only does the appearance of the robot come off as unyieldingly harsh but not reliable and unhuman. People often underestimate the effect that a warm pair of eyes, a quick smile or even an “I’m here if you need me” can have on an emotionally charged person who is so afraid that they jump at the sight of their own shadow.

The concept of your life changing in the blink of an eye is often underestimated until you face the situation. It is in those moments that the blood pumps faster, our adrenaline flows, and our fight or flight instincts kick in. When it comes to reacting appropriately in those situations human police officers are much more accurate in response than robots. Because robots are either preprogrammed or remotely operated, the likeliness of a fast response time or changing the program to react in that split second is nearly impossible. With human police officers, one of the things that they are taught in the Police Academy is to analyze a situation as quickly and accurately as possible while ultimately following your instincts when the situation calls. Timing is everything when it comes to calls like hostage situations or talking down a suicidal citizen and the following quote sums up just how much that split second can mean: “There can be as much value in the blink of an eye as in the months of rational analysis” (Gladwell). For thousands, if not millions of dispatches worldwide that have made a turn for the negative those seconds are the difference between literal life and death. If the situation takes a turn for the negative, robots are merely reprogrammed with what could be the best possible solution should it ever happen again while human officers analyze the situation, train for it, and constantly remind themselves of what they could have done better. For some officers, the few the loose in these situations are their motivation to prevent similar crimes from happening again.

While the initial cost of a robotic police officer is pretty high and maintenance costs can accumulate, they can be considered more cost effective than a salaried human officer who requires medical/dental insurance, their salary, uniforms, paid sick time/time off, and holiday/time and a half pay if they pull an extra shift or cover for someone unless you take in the initial purchase price and annual maintenance fees. In the United States, the salaries of human police officers can be as low as $31,060 a year in Mississippi to as high as $81,970 a year in California, making the national average around $47,000 a year in the United States. According to a joint study between the Florida International University’s Discovery Lab and Lieutenant Commander Jeremy Robins of the US Navy, the two are working to combine robots and humans in order to get disabled police officers and military veterans back to work on the force. They would work as patrol officers, operating wheeled telepresence robots and doing everything from responding to 911 calls and writing parking tickets to ensuring the security of nuclear facilities”(Hornyack). These ‘telepresence robot’ patrol officers are about$250,000 per robot (Hornyak). The cost of one of those robots is about equal to the salary of a police officer making $47,000 for five years, or, the cost of five police officers at relatively entry level positions for a full year. If that is the cost, why wouldn’t we remain hiring human police officers- people with families, mortgages, bills and futures all depending on a steady job in times when jobs can be scarce and hard to come by? Another financial benefit of human police officers over robotic police officers is that human officers have provided jobs and jobs mean money, which can influence the person to spend and put the money back into the economy. If the police officers buy their food at grocery stores or farmers markets, their clothes and goods from local small businesses, or take a few extra classes locally, the money that they are being paid to protect the people of their great cities and towns is being put back into the local and national economies, which is helping to slowly build the nation back up following the recession and the fiscal deficit. While the robots may be able to work more consecutive shifts than human offers are allowed according to local mandates, the breakup of shifts allows the employment of more officers which means a rejuvenation of the economy.

Though robots in law enforcement are primarily used for calls that could be dangerous to human officers such as incident containment, search and rescue, and working with explosives, there are other jobs that maybe, just maybe, they could perform. With everything that has happened in Ferguson, Missouri within the last year perhaps a robotic police officer in similar areas may be helpful, or at the last outward facing dash cams in the cruisers. The robots could be used anywhere from crowd control to crime scene analysis to patrolling the streets during riots in order to dissuade rioters from looting and destroying homes and businesses. Even though performing the duties in a town as torn as Ferguson is dangerous, human cops still do it every day, despite the risk and without needing to be plugged in and recharged.

In conclusion, robots have no place in replacing human police officers on the force. Despite the fact that when it comes to handling bombs or search and rescue robots have a purpose, they do not belong walking (or rolling) along the beat. From the beginning the job has been for humans who were looking out for other humans and there should be no reason to change that now. The term “Protect and Serve” that is so often quoted by police departments on their uniforms and crests isn’t just a saying: it is a way of life, a promise, and a signal that if you need them they will be there to help protect you and keep you safe against physical and in some ways mental or emotional threats, both foreign and domestic.

 

Work Cited:

Gladwell, Malcolm. Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York: Little, Brown, 2005. Print

Hornyak, Tim. “Your Move, Creep: Researchers Building RoboCop Policeman.” CNET. CNET, 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

“Important Dates in Law Enforcement History.” National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund: N.p., 14 Apr. 2014. Web. 30 Nov. 2014.

Proposal Essay Outline- Why Robots Don’t Belong on the Beat

Introduction– Since the industrial revolution it seems as if technology has infiltrated most industries, not excluding the law enforcement offices nationally and internationally. Having started out as hand held radios and dispatch centers that send information across a line to squad cars, it is now laptops and tablets in the cruisers, machines that measure a person’s blood alcohol level and even infrared scanners that are used to fingerprint person and perp alike rather than an ink pad and piece of cardstock. But what about the human side of police work? I believe that while to some extent robots in police work is acceptable, the position should be held in majority by the flesh and blood police officer. Thesis: Robots would not be a good replacement for beat cops because empathy and split second decision making, two things they lack, are very important to the job

 

General Background– Established in April of 1635, the very first police ‘department’ in the United States stemmed from a night watch group in the thirteen colonies that patrolled Boston, Massachusetts, without pay.  (National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund) Since then offices have expanded throughout the United States and across the remaining continents, progressing slowly with technology. As of the late twentieth and early twenty first centuries spun about there were suddenly more options as technical science and the more hands on industrial technology fields boomed. It was an evolution, spreading bits of knowledge and gear to the ends of the earth. The use of robots in law enforcement started with the World War II era military, evolving over the years to aid soldiers before hitting the home front, like most of the current police technology.

Empathy– With the added media presence in today’s police work and the various shows glorifying the job it is easy to see how some police officers would have a bit of an ego and despite their ego, the majority of officers can switch it off to empathize with the victims of crimes and the people that they interact with on calls. While some departments mandate sensitivity training, others do not. But the problem with using robots in police work is that they lack the ability to empathize with victims in their cases, they cannot make split second decisions and the robots could easily be hacked- something that could be a huge risk if the hacker is also interested in detonating the bomb that the robot is trying to defuse.  If the officers are dispatched to a rape or a case of child abuse it is all about being able to communicate a sense of understanding, to convincingly open your soul up so that the victim feels comfortable enough to relate to you their stories. As a piece of non-feeling metal, alloys and electronics, not only does the appearance of the robot come off as unyieldingly harsh but not reliable and unhuman. People often underestimate the effect that a warm pair of eyes, a quick smile or even an “I’m here if you need me” can have on an emotionally charged person who is so afraid that they jump at the sight of their own shadow.

Split Second Decisions– For the last hundred or so years the concept of bad things happening in a ‘flash’ or a split second has become the norm. It is in those moments that the blood pumps faster, our adrenaline flows and our fight or flight instincts kick in. when it comes to reacting appropriately in those situations human police officers are much more accurate in response than robots. Because robots are either preprogrammed or remotely operated, the likeliness of a fast response time or changing the program to react in that split second is nearly impossible. With human police officers, one of the things that they are taught in the Police Academy is to analyze a situation as quickly and accurately as possible while ultimately following your instincts when the situation calls. For thousands, if not millions of dispatches worldwide that have made a turn for the negative those seconds are the difference between literal life and death and where if they feel the human officer feels the loss and once again empathizes with the victims family, the robot just moves on as if nothing has happened.

 

Cost effectiveness– While the initial cost of a robotic police officer is pretty high and maintenance costs can accumulate, they are unfortunately cheaper than a salaried human officer who requires medical/dental insurance, their salary, uniforms, paid sick time/time off, and holiday/time and a half pay if they pull an extra shift or cover for someone. In the United States, the salaries of human police officers can be as low as $31,060 a year in Mississippi to as high as $81,970 a year in California, making the national average around $47,000 a year in the United States. According to a joint study between the Florida International University’s Discovery Lab and Lieutenant Commander Jeremy Robins of the US Navy, the two are working to combine robots and humans in order to get disabled police officers and military veterans back to work on the force. According to the article  “They would work as patrol officers, operating wheeled telepresence robots and doing everything from responding to 911 calls and writing parking tickets to ensuring the security of nuclear facilities”(Hornyack). These ‘telepresence robot’ patrol officers are about $250,000 per robot. The cost of one of those robots is about equal to the salary of a police officer making $47,000 for five years, or, the cost of five police officers at relatively entry level positions for a full year. If that is the cost, why wouldn’t we remain hiring human police officers- people with families, mortgages, bills and futures all depending on a steady job in times when jobs can be scarce and hard to come by? Another financial benefit of human police officers over robotic police officers is that human officers have provided jobs and jobs mean money, which can influence the person to spend and put the money back into the economy. If the police officers buy their food at grocery stores or farmers markets, their clothes and goods from local small businesses, or take a few extra classes locally the money that they are being paid to protect the people of their great cities and towns is being put back into the local and national economies, which is helping to slowly build the nation back up following the recession and the fiscal deficit.

Concession (with a tie back to your point)- Though robots in law enforcement are primarily used for incident containment, search and rescue, and working with explosives, there are other jobs that maybe, just maybe, they could perform. With everything that has happened in Ferguson, Missouri within the last year perhaps a robotic police officer in similar areas me be helpful, or at the last outward facing dash cams in the cruisers. The robots could be used anywhere from crowd control to crime scene analysis to patrolling the streets during riots in order to dissuade rioters from looting and destroying homes and businesses. Even though performing the duties in a town as torn as Ferguson is dangerous, human cops still do it every day, despite the risk and without needing to be plugged in and recharged.

 

Conclusion- In conclusion robots have no place in replacing human police officers on the force. Despite the fact that when it comes to handling bombs or search and rescue robots have a purpose, they do not belong walking (or rolling) along the beat. From the beginning the job has been for humans who were looking out for other humans and there should be no reason to change that now. The term “Protect and Serve” that is so often quoted by police departments on their uniforms and crests isn’t just a saying- it is a way of life, a promise, and a signal that if you need them they will be there to help protect you and keep you safe against physical and in some ways mental or emotional threats, both foreign and domestic.

 

“Important Dates in Law Enforcement History.” National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund: N.p., 14 Apr. 2014. Web. 30 Nov. 2014.

Hornyak, Tim. “Your Move, Creep: Researchers Building RoboCop Policeman.” CNET. CNET, 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

Writing reflection-rewrite

In my English 101 class this semester, I often revise and proof read my papers multiple times. As someone with minor Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, I make it a point to try and perfect my work. Not only do I read it multiple times myself but I often bring it to friends or family to read, sometimes asking teachers from other classes or even one of my high school English teacher to read the assignment. My self -assessments can sometimes be harsh- I go through Microsoft Words Spelling and Grammar check every few sentences as well as rereading my material after every paragraph, often changing things that I either don’t like or don’t think sound correct. I look for pieces that flow off the tongue like honey or melted chocolate, smooth and tasteful. I pre-plan my papers with outlines, often rewriting the outline a time or two before I am satisfied. When I’m writing for school I can be incredibly harsh on myself, something I am slowly learning to moderate. My goal is to typically receive grades in the A and high B range, especially on my writing which is why I tend to push myself so hard. Having spent the majority of my high school career proving that I was good enough for honors courses academic wise only to be turned down because of my attendance is one of my strongest driving forces. Writing my papers is getting easier as the semester progresses and I get an idea of what to expect.

Essay Three Source Analysis/Annotation

  1. Calderone, Len. “More Robotics and Automation Resources.” Robotics In Law Enforcement. Robotics Tomorrow, 15 Mar. 2013. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.
  2. Hornyak, Tim. “Your Move, Creep: Researchers Building RoboCop Policeman .” CNET. CNET., 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2014. Website
  3. How Police Use Robots to Investigate Bomb Threats. YouTube. PBS Newshour, 31 May 2013. Web. 03 Nov. 2014.
  4. Sorid, Daniel. “Trying to Give Bomb Squad Robots Brains to Match Their Brawn.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 21 June 2000. Web. 29 Oct. 2014. Website
  5. Westlund, Donna. “The Rise of the Police Robot.” Guardian Liberty Voice. Guardian Liberty Voice, 08 May 2014. Web. 03 Nov. 2014.
  1. “Outfitted with cameras, microphones, and sensors for chemical, biological, or nuclear agents, a bomb disposal robot can help the bomb disposer get an idea of what type of bomb they are dealing with.” This article shows multiple robot designs used in law enforcement situations such as search and rescue, handling bombs and other explosives, hostage negotiation, hazmat situations, domestic situations and even crowd control. Giving examples of the different models in use and their measurements and statistics, Calderone exhibits the way the robots are possible of strengthening the police forces ranks. His article is mostly an archive of the different models available to law enforcement agencies. This is a reliable article because the information is backed up by statistics and the authors entire website is about robots.
  2. In Time Hornyak’s article, he write of how Florida International University’s Discovery Lab has teamed up with US Navy Lt. Commander Jeremy Robbins have joined forces to adapt a robot to serve as the physical presence for disabled police officers and military veterans who wish to work in law enforcement. The research is currently working with two robots worth $500,000 a piece to determine if it is even possible for this to happen.  The hope is that once these robots are successfully created, they will allow disabled police officers to remain on the force and for returning soldiers who were injured in the line of duty to have a job when they come stateside. It is a noble concept. This article seems reliable because it was written with information granted by Florida International University and The United State Navy.
  3. This video was a demonstration on how police departments use robots to disable bombs. Meant for a news station, it was posted to Youtube to share the experience with people worldwide. Reliability is shown through the fact that is a video interview posted on youtube by a news station.
  4. ”There have been several other situations where we could have used it,” said Capt. Ray Schultz, ”but we just weren’t comfortable with our proficiency.” ”Police agencies have a very limited budget,” he said, ”and those who can afford to have a robot, or who have gone through the pain of getting funds allocating to buy a robot, want to use them for as many situations as they can.” In this article Albuquerque, New Mexico police speak of the way they use their robots and the struggle that comes with learning the ropes. They spent so much money on the robot they do have to use it only twelve times because they only train with it two hours a month which makes having it a moot point.
  5. In the Donna Westlund article, it discusses the trouble of using robots and how there is a new robot known as K5 coming onto the scene. With the capabilities of a canine officer, the k5 is five feet and 300 pounds of technology and outfitted to ‘sniff’ out explosives, narcotics and humans in search and rescue operations. The K5 is based off of robots currently being used in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Robots in Law Enforcement – Essay 3 rough draft

           

Within the past two and a half decades it seems as if robots have infiltrated nearly every aspect of everyday life, including the offices of law enforcement and public safety. While the job is still mostly held by flesh and blood officers who have sworn to protect and serve in various towns, cities, states and countries there are still the gadget and gear robots who are better equipped for certain situations. Like any piece or series of ‘good’ technology, robots have their pros and cons, things that impact the community more than we would think. While the pros are often emphasized in shows such as “Flashpoint” with the anti-explosives robot ‘Babycakes’ and “Almost Human” where one of the main characters is a robot that looks and is capable of acting somewhat like a human, there is a great divide. Whether or not robots should be used in law enforcement or whether they should be left out of the industry seems to be the question circulating around.

 

On the positive end of the spectrum robots have recently been used to find and disable bombs, clear hairy situations so that officers could enter safely (such as hostage situations, robberies and domestic situations), search out narcotics and explosives during large events, catch illegal poachers red handed in Wisconsin and even control heavy crowds where a police presence is typically fought. It has gone beyond the use of computers in the offices  or squad car and now the police departments that can afford the merchandise or are granted the money have access to robots that can do all these things while officers are safely out of harm’s way. In a study between Florida International University’s Discovery Lab and Lieutenant Commander Jeremy Robins of the US Navy, the two are working to combine robots and humans in order to get disabled police officers and military veterans back to work on the force. To quote the article “They would work as patrol officers, operating wheeled telepresence robots and doing everything from responding to 911 calls and writing parking tickets to ensuring the security of nuclear facilities”(Hornyack). Not only would the robots be keeping injured or disabled police officers on the job, but they would be providing jobs for the thousands of disabled military veterans who risked life and limb for our freedom. There are so many ways for robots in police work to make life easier and safer.

 

And yet, on the other hand, there are a series of cons that may make having robots in law enforcement a moot point. With the rate at which technology changes, it is incredibly difficult to keep up with the software and material, let alone the price of the equipment. One of the robots from the study by Florida International University costs around $500,000 and even now that the military has ‘retired’ some of their robots and equipment, they’re selling them to United States police departments for hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars. As the software and technology changes or a newer product becomes available, officer must learn how to use the equipment which sometimes takes a long time. In the Daniel Sorid article “Trying to Give Bomb Squad Robots the Brains to Match their Brawn” where Sorid interviews the Albuquerque Police Department, the department says that though they have some training with their explosives robot, it is still necessary for an officer in the correct gear to go out into the situation because the officers aren’t comfortable with the robot and its controls. With training sessions only lasting two hours a month, having the robots sitting on the side lines seems to be putting civilians and officers at risk while wasting the money spent on the device. The use of robots in law enforcement is a touchy subject not only because of the money and training, but their lack to think critically and to make split second decisions. Because robots are preprogrammed for certain situations their ability to face a rapidly changing situation and handle it with caution and tact is limited. If the situation isn’t programmed into it, then the results could be catastrophic.  Imagine being the victim of a hostage situation and depending on a robot to save your life- one wrong move and your risk of death increases. The technology of robots can always be improved and their uses to serve the public can always expand.

Bibliography

Calderone, Len. “More Robotics and Automation Resources.” Robotics In Law Enforcement. Robotics Tomorrow, 15 Mar. 2013. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

 

Hornyak, Tim. “Your Move, Creep: Researchers Building RoboCop Policeman.” CNET. CNET, 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2014. >

 

How Police Use Robots to Investigate Bomb Threats. YouTube. PBS Newshour, 31 May 2013. Web. 03 Nov. 2014.

 

Sorid, Daniel. “Trying to Give Bomb Squad Robots Brains to Match Their Brawn.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 21 June 2000. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

 

Westlund, Donna. “The Rise of the Police Robot.” Guardian Liberty Voice. Guardian Liberty Voice, 08 May 2014. Web. 03 Nov. 2014.

 

 

 

Essay 3 Sources: The Use of Robots in Law Enforcement

Calderone, Len. “More Robotics and Automation Resources.” Robotics In Law Enforcement. Robotics Tomorrow, 15 Mar. 2013. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

 

Hornyak, Tim. “Your Move, Creep: Researchers Building RoboCop Policeman.” CNET. CNET, 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

 

How Police Use Robots to Investigate Bomb Threats. YouTube. PBS Newshour, 31 May 2013. Web. 03 Nov. 2014.

Magnuson, Stew. “Law Enforcement Agencies To Receive Surplus Bomb Disposal Robots.” National Defense 702 (2012): 29-30. Academic Search Premier. Web. 5 Nov. 2014    data base

Smith, Julian. “Bambi Bites Back.” New Scientist 208.2792/2793 (2010): 02. Academic Search Premier. Web. 5 Nov. 2014.  data base

Sorid, Daniel. “Trying to Give Bomb Squad Robots Brains to Match Their Brawn.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 21 June 2000. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

Westlund, Donna. “The Rise of the Police Robot.” Guardian Liberty Voice. Guardian Liberty Voice, 08 May 2014. Web. 03 Nov. 2014.